S&P cuts Meta outlook to negative on rising AI spending
S&P Global Ratings kept Meta's AA- rating but warned a downgrade is possible within two years as free cash flow turned negative.
S&P Global Ratings lowered its outlook on Meta from stable to negative on October 30, 2026, while keeping the company's AA- credit rating, according to aitimes.com. The agency warned that a downgrade is possible within the next two years.
S&P tied the decision to weaker cash flow disclosed in Meta's third-quarter results. Revenue rose 26% year-on-year to $64.6 billion, but operating income fell 37% to $13 billion, a figure that includes a $9.9 billion settlement cost tied to a youth mental health lawsuit.
Operating cash flow for the quarter was $32.8 billion against capital expenditure of about $34.9 billion, leaving a free cash flow deficit of $2.12 billion. Meta expects full-year capital expenditure of $135 billion to $145 billion.
S&P projects Meta's capital expenditure next year will exceed $225 billion, with a free cash flow deficit of $71 billion. The agency said Meta's long-term debt stood at $80.9 billion at the end of September, and forecast its leverage ratio could pass 1.0x as early as 2027, up from about 0.1x last year.
A Meta spokesperson said the company disagrees with S&P's assessment of its AI monetization capability. Before the Meta action, S&P had cut Oracle's credit rating to BBB- and revised Broadcom's outlook from positive to stable, and The Wall Street Journal recently reported that lenders and investors in AI infrastructure financing are scrutinizing profitability and risk more strictly.
Quick answers
What is Meta's current credit rating?
Meta holds an AA- rating from S&P Global Ratings, which kept the rating but changed the outlook to negative on October 30, 2026.
Why did S&P change Meta's outlook?
S&P cited worsening cash flow in Meta's third-quarter results, where capital expenditure of about $34.9 billion outpaced operating cash flow of $32.8 billion.
What did Meta say about the outlook change?
A Meta spokesperson said the company disagrees with S&P's claims about its AI monetization capability.